Finance and General Purposes Committee Minutes 22 June 2022
Finance and General Purposes Committee Minutes 22 June 2022
Corporation and Committee Minutes- Finance and General Purposes Committee Minutes 22 June 2022
Minutes of a meeting of the board of Leicester College corporation: Finance and general purposes committee
Held on 22 June 2022
Present: Danielle Gillett (Chair), Ed Marsh* (item 8.2 only), Verity Hancock, Caroline Tote, Jonathan Kerry*
In Attendance: Louise Hazel - Director of Governance and Policy, Shabir Ismail - Deputy Principal/CEO, Della Sewell - Director of HR
*Joined meeting online via Teams
- Declaration of interests - Verity Hancock, Louise Hazel, Shabir Ismail and Della Sewell declared an - interest in item 8. 
 
- Apologies for absence - 2.1 Apologies for absence were received from Chan Kataria. Ed Marsh would join - the meeting late. 
 
- Minutes of previous meeting and matters arising - 3.1 The minutes of the meeting held on 4 May 2022 were received and agreed. 
- 3.2 The confidential minutes of the meeting held on 4 May 2022 were received - and agreed. 
 
- Financial report (Period 10) and Summer reforecast - 4.1 The Deputy Principal presented the finance report (period 10) and summer - reforecast. The following points were highlighted. - 4.1.1 The year to date result was an operating deficit after restructuring - costs of £1,675k compared to the budgeted deficit of £1,308k. 
- 4.1.2 Student numbers were below target and the College was not expecting - to meet its 16-18 target by the end of the year. 
- 4.1.3 It would fall short of its AEB allocation and was currently expecting to - achieve around 84%. A further reduction of £775k in income was - reflected in the summer reforecast. The impact of COVID-19 was still - being felt but the cost of living crisis was also biting with more people - prioritising work over study. The ESFA was holding to the 97% - tolerance but it would now claw back the whole underspend up to - 100% of the allocation; previously it would have clawed back - underspend up to 97%. This meant there was a potential - understatement of £300k for the clawback expected. It was not - proposed to make any changes to the plan at this point as this was still - well below the materiality threshold. The position would be kept under - review and mitigated where possible to avoid breaking bank - covenants. 
- 4.1.4 Apprenticeships income was in line with the reduced spring reforecast - target of £3.9m, excluding employer incentives. With timely - achievement, the budgeted figure should be achieved although end - point assessment achievement was outside the College’s control. 
- 4.1.5 HE income was below the spring forecast target by £39k. This had - been adjusted in the summer reforecast. 
- 4.1.6 Pay remained a challenge; overtime and PTL costs continued to be - monitored carefully. Restructuring costs were likely to be lower than - planned. 
- 4.1.7 Following the summer reforecast, the overall total comprehensive - income after restructuring costs had decreased from a deficit of £957k - to a deficit of £1,063k. The EBITDA remained positive. 
- 4.1.8 The College remained in the ‘requires improvement’ financial health - rating at 170 points. It continued to meet its bank covenants but this - was very sensitive to any further adverse movements. 
- 4.1.9 A release of £695k had been included within the summer reforecast, - representing part of the Lennartz creditor, which would now not be - payable. This amount represented out of time assessments, which - could not be raised by the HMRC. The College had received written - confirmation from HMRC that this was the case. 
 
- 4.2 Governors asked a number of questions including: - 4.2.1 Whether the 84% AEB achievement was an assumption or a fact? - It was an assumption; achievement still needed to be added in and - summer schools were still recruiting. 
- 4.2.2 When would the outturn be known? This was likely to be in October. 
- 4.2.3 Was there more that could be released under the Lennartz line? - There was the potential for more but this was not out of scope and so - should not be released yet. 
- 4.2.4 Releasing this now would help reduce the deficit to £1m? Correct. 
 
- 4.3 Governors noted the period 10 finance report and agreed to recommend - the summer reforecast to Corporation for approval. 
 
- Draft budget 2022/23 and Financial plan 2023/24 - 5.1 The Deputy Principal presented draft budget 2022/23 and financial plan - 2023/24. The following points were highlighted. - 5.1.1 The planned budget for 2022/23 showed an operating deficit of £434k - with a breakeven budget in 2023/24 of £58k. The EBITDA was - £1,572k, and 3.5% with financial health at 170 points, Requires - Improvement, moving to 180 points and Good financial health in - 2023/24, based on the current system. 
- 5.1.2 The key risks facing the College were highlighted and included - achievement of the planned funding body income levels within the - resources allocated due to the economic climate, the allocation - process and a complex funding formula. Any further funding or policy - changes might also impact adversely on the College. 
- 5.1.3 The College was planning to earn up to 103% of its AEB allocation. 
- 5.1.4 There would continue to be pressures on pay and non-pay including - inflation rates. A pay award of 2.25% had been included in the budget - but this would not prevent industrial action. 
- 5.1.5 Achievement of the Apprenticeships budget and the continued - engagement of employers following the pandemic remained - challenging. 
- 5.1.6 There remained a further risk that COVID-19 might return more - aggressively leading to further disruption or more students not wanting - to engage. The cost of living crisis would also continue to impact on - people’s willingness to participate in education. 
- 5.1.7 Capital expenditure of £1.2M was assumed in 2022/23. 
- 5.1.8 The risks would be managed throughout the year. A reforecast would - be undertaken in the autumn term once enrolments were known. The - College had a revolving credit facility and would draw this down if - needed. 
 
- 5.2 The Principal commented that the budget was very tight and there were some - brave assumptions. The proposed budget for 2022/23 relied heavily on the - College’s ability to achieve its income targets, and increasingly generate - income within the resources allocated. Staff knew the importance of recruitment - and ESOL and skills for life summer schools were running now. If recruitment - did not improve, further efficiencies would need to be identified. Less viable - classes would be reviewed and the College would need to restructure. This - would be looked at early in the academic year, after the autumn reforecast. 
- 5.3 Governors asked a number of questions including: - 5.3.1 Would there be an indication of how recruitment was going by the - time of the October F&GP? There would be early indications for 16- - 19 and HE by then and some idea of AEB although this recruited - throughout the year. 
- 5.3.2 What were the main risks associated with the ‘brave - assumptions’? The assumption of achievement of 103% of the AEB - was the main risk. The assumption that apprenticeships would - increase from the current position was also a risk and HE recruitment - was unknown. 
- 5.3.3 The cost of living crisis was a major risk and was unlikely to - dissipate quickly. Agreed, inflation at approaching 10% would - impact adversely in a number of ways. 
- 5.3.4 When would decisions need to be made? By mid-October, it would - be possible to look at structures where areas were down and any - proposals would be ready for the December F&GP and Corporation - meetings so they could be acted on in the second term. 
- 5.3.5 Were the risks identified in the risk register and could a more - explicit link be made? The risks were included in the risk register but - they would be identified more clearly in the budget paper and reports. 
 
- 5.4 Governors agreed to recommend the draft budget for 2022/23 and - financial plan for 2023/24 to Corporation for approval, subject to - amendment to include a 2.5% staff pay award in 2022/23 
 
- Bad debt write-off - 6.1 The Deputy Principal presented a paper requesting authority to write-off debts - that were considered uncollectable. The following points were highlighted: - 6.1.1 The debts had been chased as far as possible and were now - considered to be uncollectable. 
- 6.1.2 During the academic year to date, from 1 August 2021, there had been - previous write offs of £51,499.29. With this recommendation, the - cumulative total for the year would be £60,222.81. 
 
- 6.2 Governors considered the paper and agreed to approve the write-off of - uncollectable debts totalling £8,723.52. 
 
- Committee workplan 2022/23 - 7.1 The Director of Governance and Policy presented the Committee workplan for - 2022/23. The following points were highlighted. - 7.1.1 The workplan followed a similar format to the current year. 
- 7.1.2 Additional meetings would be called if it was felt necessary. 
 
- 7.2 Governor approved the Committee workplan for 2022/23 and requested - that an additional date be found for November should another meeting be - needed. 
 
- Pay - CONFIDENTIAL 
- Waivers of financial regulations - 9.1 Governors received and noted the report on waivers of financial - regulations. 
- 9.2 Governors noted that one of the waivers was for £515k for costs of roof - repairs. This was significant but the reason for the waiver was - understood. 
 
- Dates of next meetings - 5 October 2022 
- 1 December 2022 
- 1 March 2023 
- 3 May 2023 
- 22 June 2023